« more of Juliana's buttons | Main | more crazy less ... crazy. »

August 22, 2008

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83452564169e200e554215f758833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference ...have been thinking...:

Comments

outside looking outside

I have mentioned to you before that I have found your art inspirational, and helpful in my own pursuits. I find it inspirational for all the normal visual stimulations one enjoys when viewing art.

But to this bird, most stimulating of all isn't how....but WHY you create.

Thank you for that,
Gregulationsarefortheregular.

jeanne herself

have been pondering hesitation this morning, and here you are (of course) addressing that very thing;) looking at hesitation, i think, can teach us a lot about ourselves. do we hesitate to avoid criticism? what a waste cause criticism is inevitable. do we hesitate for fear of offending? isn't that, too, a waste because let's face it: some will be offended because you said too much, some because you said too little, some because of the WAY you said either too much or too little. sigh. criticism and misunderstanding are unavoidable - especially if you are one committed to public expression . . . and that leads me into the path of who-asked-you-anyway. okay, it's still quagmired, my pondering: hesitation (inside) all tangled up with entitlement (outside), truth, freedom, expression, safety. and maybe i ought to have more sense than to post this pitifully incomplete/barely-the-beginning stream. will close this disjointed ramble by saying that i'm so glad you overcame your hesitation and wrote then posted this entry. it's a conversation that needs to happen.

Paula Hewitt

As the only person who critised your friends in the comments the other day I guess I'm the one you mean when you write: ' scope and breadth of judgement that mirrored - and perhaps exceeded - their own version of same ' so I wont go there again. :) As you know from oue emails - I wasnt intending to be judgemental, but supportive, and you are right - it did hit a nerve because I have been on the receiving end of the same.

I have had a similar experience with CQ - I am planning to post some photos of CQ quilts I made with commercial cottons before i started blogging, and realised that they really arent *real* CQ at all. Ill write more about what i think there.

I read with interest Jeannes comment about hesitation - i have been hesitating, not so much because I am concerned about being critised but because I am worried that i may cause offense to those who ideas of CQ (or any other technique for that matter) are different to mine.(and despite my earlier gaffe i am concerned about not causing offence)

And i dont understand your point about being not ashamed about learning stitches from a book - Every embroidery stitch I know i have learned form a book -do others find that shameful?

good news about the blood work and meds - i hope you get back on an even keel

Susan

How odd! I've been doing cq for almost two decades and always use cotton, linen and silk, no after 5 satins and velvets and yucky, sleezy fabrics. I'm sorry your friends discouraged you, because it is the embellishments that make cq, not the fabric content. If we're going to break free of the past in quilting, then I think we must do the same with cq.

annalisa

Hmm I think the stories behind your crazy quilt are exactly what makes it authentic. each object has meaning and is imbued with beauty as a result (plastic not withstanding) you might enjoy this post on authenticity that I immediately thought of when I read yours http://kirstyhall.co.uk/blog/2008/08/authenticity-sacredness-and-plastic-bags/

Acey

Paula - as I have explained in a new private mail you were not *at all* the only one who responded to this point - simply the only one who did so in the comments section. Am quite sorry for any sting you felt from my subsequent words.

Am also guilty of being unclear/careless in the way I presented the unseen scope of the response I received. It also seems important to say that I'm further guilty of enabling judgments in the first place through the way I described the response to my purchase choices. It was accurate but maybe not necessary. There's some important food for thought here including my intention to turn a more mindful eye towards future self-editing choices.

Jeanne - my personal reasons for hesitancy sometimes involve an inherent reluctance to cause offense - though I have no objection serving the function of an alarm clock (and who really "likes" them, at least on most mornings...)there's no reason to knowingly OR unmindfully cause hard or hurt feelings.

That said more recently I have been experiencing some rather profound sorts of hesitancy as I seem to have developed an over-riding sensitivity to evoking a level of psychoanalytic response that's intense enough to feel like very unwelcome privacy invasion. Again it seems important to stress that this most clearly refers to what doesn't necessarily show on the public screen and relates - for the most part - to more intense forms of communication in emails, etc.

Greg - call me nuts but I always feel like I've accomplished something in the writerly sense when you show yourself this way. Have been thinking for a couple of weeks about your remark that nobody ever accused you of being the life of the party and how, as funny as that remark is to me, it's even funnier (as well as quite fitting) that I personally consider you one of the best & brightest "parties" in my own life. You know. On the inside and deep behind the mirrored shades where it counts the most, anyway.


Acey

Susan - thanks for stopping by and commenting. This helped me to understand more cohesively that I am not personally very interested in 'breaking away from the past of quilting' but, rather, returning to the roots/core of working with what(EVER) I most enjoy in order to express a personally relevant/authentic statement. There are definitely satins and velvets in my collection plus I inherited some killer taffeta fabrics from my mother.

Annalisa - what a great post you linked to! This is exactly what I was trying to express with the additional quadrant of another topic that's very near and dear to me. Good reading, indeed

Kathy V in NM

Well, Acey, you have company in your "indie" way of creating this wonderful folk art. I, too, am not one to follow what everyone else does or has done and generally follow my heart and eye in everything I do.

Kinda reminds me of the elementary school art teacher who demands that all of the kids do exactly the same thing in class -- real creativity in that, right?

Lotsa love,

Kathy V in NM

jude

well, what is interesting about all this is he strange habit we have of forming groups that somehow start out as free expression and then end up limiting it. i totally love the discussions about all this. no shame in anything actually, do styles form around rules? can style be collective or does it have to be personal. or is it a combo of both? these are questions i am asking myself lately.
this block is so crazy and so you at the same time.

Cathie

Acey - this block is fabulously "crazy." We create as a means of "self" expression -- emphasis on "self" and you have that aspect mastered my dear!

Kathy

First I want to say I like your block. I feel CQ quilts are your own interpertation, anything goes, it's what you like. It will be in your home. Rules to me only apply if being judged in a quilt competition and there are guidelines to follow or in a swap that has certain guidelines. As for fabrics, the busier the fabric would lead to less embellishing, the plain fabrics would need additional embellishing so it wouldn't look so empty. That leads to the question do you use busier fabrics or plain. It is the choice of the quilter. It also brings up the topic of hand quilting or machine quilting. Does machine quilting (non traditional) make it anyless of a quilt? I don't think so. It is how quilting changes from one decade/century to another. It is expanding the mindset of traditional quilting.
Have fun and enjoy. By the way, I like the butterfly button. Will check out more of your blog.

Kathy

I forgot to mention, unless you have someone to teach you embroidery stitches, how are you to learn other than from a book.
No shame in that.

Karen

I always thought that a "crazy" quilt was a freeform type of quilting where there were no rules. While I understand that maybe specific techniques are to be followed for the piece to fall into a certain category or "label", I have never been comfortable with the notion that art has to be exactly this way or that way in order for it to "qualify" as something. Labels can get in the way of truly seeing the essence of something beautiful. All that said, I love your crazy quilt piece. It is so rich in color.
-Karen
p.s. I've tagged you if you'd like to play "6 Random Things" but, of course, it's entirely optional.

glennis

wow! lots of thoughts here. actually, the very name, "crazy" quilt, is part of what defines the style for me. crazy quilts are so fascinating to me- especially antique or vintage ones as they often tell a story or offer a glimpse into the life of the maker by the type of fabrics used and the stitches taken. i am a little surprised to learn that there could be a right or wrong way to make a CQ square....but i think i will delete that knowledge and go on thinking i can do it any ol' way i want- just for me. jude's comment on forming groups to express ourselves that often end up limiting our expression is a good one. i needed that reminder today-thanks all!

Linda

It's astounding to me that there are people who feel there should be any rules to creativity, and that they feel the need to express to others that they should hold to them. That's contrary to the very definition of creativity.

Outside of the issue of rules, the fact that a person *dislikes* someone else's creative work is only relevant to that person; putting her negative energy into another's contented creative space is simply obnoxious.

Someone criticizes my creation, and they're not likely to ever get to see another one!

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment